IUI + Clomid - as effective as natural conception?!?!

CD27
BFN.

So... this article sort of pisses me off.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7547400.stm

What the frig?

My favourite line, "The treatments have both been offered for many years because "doing nothing" is an unpopular choice among patients, the researchers said."

Next favourite line, "But the researchers were quick to point out that it is a very useful treatment for women who have problems with ovulation."
Um, yeah, hi, hello?  I DON'T HAVE PROBLEMS WITH OVULATION.
I ovulate every month.
My problems are mysterious once again.
And sucky.

I've been spotting since late at night on CD25.  This is lame.  I was hoping my spotting was fixed.  I barely had any last cycle.  Does this mean I am doing something wrong with eating?  Too much cheese last weekend?  Too much meat?

My spotting has practically stopped this afternoon.  Great, you're thinking - maybe implantation bleeding?  But BFN says otherwise.  And it is CD27, there should be some sort of faint line by now if one was coming - uh, right?

So...what the hay?  Do I go for IUI again?  100mg Clomid is quite painful for me - if it is all for nothing....ugh, and all the wanding and bloodwork.....

(sigh)
Maybe it is time for Napro.  Probably it has been time for a long time.  But another doctor, and more rounds of tests and complicatedness... I just haven't been up for it.

Well - and DH and I just got into a big fight about it.  Not motivational.